Home owners click here

The brighter side of soils: Quantum dots track organic
nitrogen through fungi and plants


MATTHEW D. WHITESIDE,1 KATHLEEN K. TRESEDER, AND PETER R. ATSATT
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,
University of California, Irvine, California 92697 USA


Abstract. Soil microorganisms mediate many nutrient transformations that are central in terrestrial cycling of carbon and nitrogen. However, uptake of organic nutrients by microorganisms is difficult to study in natural systems. We assessed quantum dots (fluorescent nanoscale semiconductors) as a new tool to observe uptake and translocation of organic nitrogen by fungi and plants. We conjugated quantum dots to the amino groups of glycine, arginine, and chitosan and incubated them with Penicillium fungi (a saprotroph) and annual bluegrass (Poa annua) inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. As experimental controls, we incubated fungi and bluegrass samples with substrate-free quantum dots as well as unbound quantum dot substrate mixtures. Penicillium fungi, annual bluegrass, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi all showed uptake and translocation of quantum dot-labeled organic nitrogen, but no uptake of quantum dot controls. Additionally, we observed quantum dot- labeled organic nitrogen within soil hyphae, plant roots, and plant shoots using field imaging techniques. This experiment is one of the first to demonstrate direct uptake of organic nitrogen by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Key words: amino acids; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; chitosan; fluorescent labels; nitrogen cycle; organic nitrogen; Penicillium; quantum dots.


INTRODUCTION
Microbial communities mediate many of the soil processes that provide nutrients to plants and that release trace gases to the atmosphere. Thus, understanding how these microbial communities function is essential to understanding ecosystems as a whole. Ecosystem ecologists have traditionally approached soils as a black box in which nutrient transformations are conducted by an uncharacterized community of micro-organisms (Tiedje et al. 1999). In many cases, this framework has been appropriate; it has allowed investigators to construct nutrient budgets of ecosystems and to document patterns in soil characteristics. However, we must possess more mechanistic information about the functioning of microorganisms in ecosystems to adequately predict nutrient dynamics under a range of environmental conditions (Treseder and Allen 2000). Historically, detailed investigations have been hampered by limitations inherent in resolving the spatial dynamics of microbial processes taking place in a complex, fragile, and opaque environment.

One recent subject of debate is the extent to which plants are able to directly consume organic nitrogen (ON). Traditionally, ON was thought to undergo a transformation into inorganic N before being taken up by plants (Liebig 1843). This theory assumes N

Manuscript received 21 December 2007; revised 6 May 2008; accepted 3 June 2008. Corresponding Editor (ad hoc): K. M. Scow.
1 E-mail: mwhitesi@uci.edu
mineralization is the limiting process for plant growth in most ecosystems (Vitousek 1997). However, isotope labeling has provided evidence that plants can take up ON, at least as simple forms such as amino acids (Turnbull et al. 1995, Lipson and Monson 1998, Nasholm et al. 1998, Lipson and Nasholm 2001, Miller and Cramer 2005, Rains and Bledsoe 2007). It is unclear, however, whether ON molecules are directly assimilated by plant roots or plants acquire ON indirectly via mycorrhizal fungi or other microbial symbionts.

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; see Plate 1) are common worldwide and form symbioses with ~80% of plant families (Newman and Reddell 1987, Smith and Read 1997). They mine the soil for nutrients and translocate a portion to their host plants in exchange for carbon (Smith and Read 1997). The prevailing paradigm is that AMF specialize in the capture of inorganic nutrients such as phosphate, ammonium, and nitrate (Read 1991, Smith and Smith 1997). Uptake of ON by AMF has been challenging to investigate in natural systems because of technical difficulties in tracing the flow of organically derived nutrients from the soil into hyphae.

One promising technique to investigate the flow of nutrients between plants, microorganisms, and soil in field conditions is the use of quantum dots. Quantum dots (QDs) are nanoscale semiconductors that fluoresce in different colors depending on their size (Chan and Nie 1998, Wong and Stucky 2001, Reiss et al. 2002, Alivisatos et al. 2005). They are typically composed of a cadmium selenide core wrapped in a zinc sulfide shell,


Ecology, 90(1), 2009, pp. 100–108
© 2009 by the Ecological Society of America


FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of a quantum dot and configurations of quantum dot conjugates. (A, B) The polymer coating contains receptor molecules that allow the quantum dot to form strong covalent bonds with carboxyl or amino groups of organic compounds. (A) For quantum dots that bind to amino groups of organic compounds, the receptor molecules are carboxyl groups. (B) For quantum dots that bind to carboxyl groups, the receptor molecules are amino groups. (C) Amino-bound glycine, (D) carboxyl-bound glycine, (E) amino-bound chitosan, and (F) amino-bound arginine. This study only used amino-bound substrates.


and they can be enclosed by protective polymer coatings (Fig. 1; Dubertret et al. 2002). Polymer-coated QDs are commercially available and range in diameter from 2 nm (Northern Nanotechnologies, Toronto, Ontario, Cana- da) up to 20 nm (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). There are many advantages of QDs over traditional labels and tags. Quantum dots have broad absorption spectra with very narrow emission peaks, meaning multiple colors can be assessed on the same sample by using the same light source. Since QDs are resistant to metabolic and chemical degradation and are not susceptible to photobleaching, they are effective tracers for long-term studies (Alivisatos et al. 2005, Michalet et al. 2005). Kloepfer et al. (2005) found that QD-labeled bacteria (Bacillus subtilis) retained QD fluorescence and electron density, even after storage for one year in rich medium. In addition, QDs can be bound to amino or carboxyl groups within organic compounds (Fig. 1). In this way, the movement of these compounds through soils or organisms can be imaged and tracked (Dubertret et al. 2002, Kloepfer et al. 2005). Previously, most quantum dot work focused on biomedical applications (Gao et al. 2004, Alivisatos et al. 2005, Garon et al. 2007, Qian et al. 2007). To our knowledge, this study is the first to apply quantum dot technology to ecological questions.

We assessed QDs as a tool to observe the translocation of ON in laboratory and soil-based systems.
Specifically, our objectives were to use QDs to track ON uptake (labile and recalcitrant) by a model group of non-mycorrhizal fungi, Penicillium solitum, and by AMF-colonized plants. By testing this technique on Penicillium fungi, we assessed uptake of QD substrates in a known ON-acquiring saprotroph as a proof of method. We then extended this method to AMF to examine ON uptake by this group. We used glycine and arginine (common amino acids) to represent labile ON and chitosan (deacylated form of chitin) to represent recalcitrant ON.

METHODS
Conjugation of quantum dots.—Quantum dot conjugation was performed by following a modified Kloepfer et al. (2005) method. Commercial red (565-nm emission) carboxyl QDs (Invitrogen) were conjugated with the amino group of reagent-grade glycine or arginine by using the binding activator 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylamino- propyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC). The reaction was performed in a 10-mmol/L borate buffer (pH 7.4). Each milliliter of reaction solution contained 3.33 mmol/L substrate, 0.1 μmol/L QDs, and 2 mg EDC. The conjugation reaction was performed on a gentle shaker for 3 h in the dark. The quantum dot conjugates underwent dialysis against 2 L of sterile water and were then centrifuged to remove any sedimented material.


Ecology, 90(1), 2009, pp. 100–108
© 2009 by the Ecological Society of America


PLATE 1. Arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae form web-like structures as they emanate from fine roots in a boreal forest in Alaska (USA). A springtail (Collembola) can be seen crawling among the hyphae. Photo credit: K. K. Treseder.


Quantum dot conjugation of chitosan (MP Biomedical, Solon, Ohio, USA) was performed in the same manner as for glycine and arginine except each milliliter of reaction solution contained 5.8 mg chitosan, 0.1 μmol/L QDs, and 2.2 mg EDC. The QDs used in this study were ,15 nm in diameter (Invitrogen).

Uptake of QD-ON by Penicillium solitum.—To assess uptake of QD-labeled substrates, we tested a common saprotrophic fungus, Penicillium solitum. Penicillium solitum was grown from spores in liquid modified Melin-Norkrans (MMN) media (Marx 1969). After 24 h, hyphae were transferred with 250 μL MMN into microcentrifuge tubes. The tubes were incubated with either 250 μL (0.1 μmol/L) of QD-glycine in a time series that ranged 2, 6, or 24 h; 250 μL (0.1 μmol/L) of QD- arginine, 24 h; 2.65 mg QD-chitosan in 250 μL sterile water, 5 or 24 h; a QD control of 250 μL (0.1 μmol/L) QDs containing no substrate, 2, 4, 6, or 24 h; or QD controls of 250 μL (0.1 μmol/L) QDs and substrate (glycine, arginine, or chitosan) lacking binding reagent, 2, 4, 6, or 24 h. After incubation, the hyphae were centrifuged and washed with 1% saline to remove unbound QDs. All cultures and incubations were performed in the dark. Additionally, all preceding steps were performed under sterile conditions. Quantum dots were excited using an Argon/2 laser (458 or 488 nm; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), and fungal uptake was observed with a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss). The detector was set to 565 6 10 nm and was calibrated to display no fluorescence of unlabeled
material. This approach reduced the incidence of autofluorescence.

Uptake of QD-ON by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Poa annua.—To test uptake of QD-ON substrates by AMF-colonized plants, annual bluegrass (Poa annua) was grown from seed in 1:1 autoclaved sand:vermicu- lite. Seedlings were cultivated in an 11-L planting pot inoculated with a mixture of AMF (Mycorrhizal Applications, Grants Pass, Oregon, USA). After 30 d of growth, mycorrhizal plants were transferred to sterile 10-mL capped test tubes containing 3.5 g of autoclaved 1:1 sand:vermiculite and 1.6 mL sterile water. Each tube received one plant. The plants were incubated with 500 μL QD-glycine solution, QD-chitosan, or QD control for either 4 or 24 h. After incubation, the plants were removed and gently washed with 1% saline to help remove sand particles and unbound QDs. Confocal laser scans were performed as described in Uptake of QD-ON by Penicillium solitum.

Field-applicable imaging.—To test the imaging capabilities of QD-ON substrates under more natural conditions, we used a minirhizotron to detect QD fluorescence in soils. Eight grams of Poa annua seed was cultivated in an 11-L planting pot of autoclaved 1:1 sand:vermiculite mix. The pot was inoculated with a multispecies mix of AMF (Mycorrhizal Applications) and fitted with a horizontal minirhizotron tube. Five glass applicator tubes were installed along the minirhizotron tube so that the ends of the applicators rested ~2 mm above the minirhizotron tube. The pot was watered twice per day on a misting bench in a 23ºC


Ecology, 90(1), 2009, pp. 100–108
© 2009 by the Ecological Society of America


FIG. 2. Superimposed (white light and fluorescence) confocal laser scans of Penicillium solitum uptake of quantum dot–organic nitrogen (QD–ON) conjugates. (A) At 2 h of incubation with QD-glycine, fungal hyphae showed evidence of uptake. (B) At 6 h, less labeled glycine was seen in solution and more within the hyphae. (C) After 24 h very little labeled glycine was seen outside of the hyphae. (D) After 24 h, QD-arginine fluorescence appeared in the cytoplasm but not in vesicles (arrows). (E) Uptake of QD-labeled chitosan after 5 h of incubation. (F) Quantum dot control (quantum dots unbound to glycine) after 24 h of incubation showed no signs of uptake. The scale bar is 10 μm.


greenhouse. After 30 d of growth, 25 mL (0.1 μmol/L) of QD-glycine was injected into one applicator tube above an area of observable hyphal growth. Uptake was observed using a BTC-100X minirhizotron camera (Bartz Technology, Santa Barbara, California, USA) fitted with a UV light source.

To further test QDs as a non-destructive method that could be applied in the field, we used a handheld UV light source and digital camera to observe unmagnified QD fluorescence in plant shoot tissue. Orange excitation (585-nm emission) carboxyl QDs were bound to the primary amino group of glycine. Poa annua seedlings were grown in 1:1 autoclaved sand : vermiculite. After 20 d, seedlings were transferred to sterile microcentrifuge tubes containing 1 mL QD-glycine (1 μmol/L) solution in liquid MMN media. To maintain the media at a consistent volume during the experiment, liquid MMN was added as needed. After 14 d the seedlings were harvested and thoroughly rinsed with 1% saline solution to remove any QDs unassociated with the plants. The QD conjugates were excited using a 4-V portable handheld UV light, and photos were taken with a Canon 7.1 megapixel digital camera (Canon, Lake
Success, New York, USA) without zoom or magnification.

RESULTS
Uptake of QD-ON by Penicillium solitum.—We used Penicillium solitum to test the uptake and storage of unconjugated QDs, QD-glycine, QD-arginine, and QD- chitosan, by a common, well-studied saprotrophic fungus. Within 2 h of incubation with QD-glycine, fluorescence became apparent in the vacuole compartments of the hyphae (Fig. 2A). Uptake continued throughout the 24-h duration of the experiment, and QD concentrations in hyphae intensified with time (Fig. 2B, C). Uptake was also evident using QD-arginine, but for the 24-h duration of the experiment, the label appeared to remain outside the vacuoles and instead stayed within the cytoplasm (Fig. 2D). The P. solitum fungi were able to acquire QD-chitosan (Fig. 2E). Fluorescence was observed in the cytoplasm of the hyphae within 5 h of incubation. Additionally, neither of the QD controls displayed any sign of uptake or surface binding to the hyphal walls (Fig. 2F).

Uptake of QD-ON by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Poa annua.—We used individuals of Poa annua inocu-


Ecology, 90(1), 2009, pp. 100–108
© 2009 by the Ecological Society of America


FIG. 3. Confocal light and emission scans of quantum dot–organic nitrogen (QD–ON) conjugates after incubation with the roots and mycorrhizal colonists of annual bluegrass (Poa annua). Fluorescence 4 h after incubation with QD-glycine: (A) from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) hyphae, (B) into the plant root, and (C) up to the plant shoot. Fluorescence 24 h after incubation with QD-glycine: (D) internal fluorescence of AMF vacuoles (arrows), (E) vascular tissue of the plant root (arrows), and (F) chloroplasts in the shoot cells (arrows). (G) Fluorescence in AMF after 5 h of incubation with QD-chitosan. The scale bar is 10 μm.


lated with AMF to track the movement of QD-glycine, QD-chitosan, and QD controls to hyphal, root, and shoot structures. The QD-glycine labels were first observed in AM hyphae (Fig. 3A), plant root cells (Fig. 3B), and plant shoot cells (Fig. 3C) within 4 h of incubation. After 24 h of incubation, QD-glycine had collected in specific structures within each tissue type: tube-shaped vacuoles within AM hyphae (Fig. 3D), vascular tissues within roots (Fig. 3E), and chloroplasts within shoot cells (Fig. 3F). The AM hyphae contained QD-chitosan within 5 h of incubation (Fig. 3G), but no
QD fluorescence was observed in the plant roots or shoots during the 24-h QD-chitosan treatment (data not shown). Moreover, no uptake or transportation of any QD control was seen in the fungi, plant roots, or plant shoots (data not shown).

Field-applicable imaging.—We observed fluorescence of QD-glycine within plant material and fungal hyphae by using imaging techniques that can be applied in field settings. Poa annua fluoresced with QD-glycine in both roots and shoots during a 14-d incubation period (Fig. 4A–D). We were able to excite the QD-glycine with a


Ecology, 90(1), 2009, pp. 100–108
© 2009 by the Ecological Society of America


FIG. 4. Fluorescence of quantum dot (QD)-glycine in a plant and fungi using field imaging techniques. (A–D) Unmagnified digital images of a Poa annua individual incubated with orange excitation QD-glycine: (A) white light view; (B) UV view; (C) root detail; and (D) blade detail. Orange fluorescence indicates presence of QDs. Scale bars are (A, B) 1 cm, (C) 5 mm, and (D) 500 μm. (E–G) Minirhizotron images of fungal hyphae uptake of QD-glycine: (E) white light image pre-QD injection; (F) UV image pre-QD injection; and (G) 2 h after injection of QD-glycine, UV minirhizotron images showed hyphal uptake (arrow) of the labeled glycine. The hypha is ~2 mm long.
handheld UV light source and observe movement of the label with the naked human eye. Additionally, we used a minirhizotron camera (4-μm resolution) to track the flux of QD-glycine from soil to fungal hyphae in a greenhouse experiment. The hyphae were only slightly visible before QD-glycine injection, but fluoresced 2 h after injection (Fig. 4E, F).

DISCUSSION
Our results suggest that the QD-labeled ON is taken up and transported to particular structures in fungi and plants, depending on the type of ON compound conjugated to the QD. In natural settings, proteinaceous
materials (e.g., amino acids, peptides, and proteins) comprise 40% of soil nitrogen and aminosugars comprise 5–6% (Schulten and Schnitzer 1998). As reviewed by Rentsch et al. (2007) and documented by Paungfoo-Lonhienne et al. (2008), saprotrophic and ectomycorrhizal fungi are known to directly acquire amino acids, peptide chains, and proteins, and plants contain transporters for amino acids, peptides, and proteins. Additionally, transportation of chitin and other polysaccharides is not well studied. Previous studies have shown that Penicillium fungi take up and compartmentalize intact amino acids such as glycine and arginine (Kitamoto et al. 1988, Hillenga et al. 1996) and are


Ecology, 90(1), 2009, pp. 100–108
© 2009 by the Ecological Society of America


capable of breaking down and absorbing more recalcitrant forms of ON such as the polysaccharide chitin (Binod et al. 2007). Penicillium fungi compartmentalize nutrients and amino acids in two main locations: in vacuoles where they can be stored and in cytoplasm where they can be quickly metabolized or transformed (Griffin 1994). Vacuoles of Penicillium hyphae can contain up to 51% of total cellular glycine and up to 98% of total cellular arginine (Kitamoto et al. 1988, Roos et al. 1997). We observed QD-chitosan in cytoplasm (Fig. 2E) and QD-glycine in vacuoles (Fig. 2A–C), but QD-arginine was observed in cytoplasm and not vacuoles (Fig. 2D). The lack of QD-arginine in vacuoles is most likely the result of QD-arginine size after conjugation. Glycine contains one amino terminal as a potential QD binding site (Fig. 1C); however, arginine contains two (Fig. 1F). Therefore, it is possible for each arginine molecule to bind with more than one QD during conjugation. The QD-arginine (theoretically twice as large as QD-glycine) may be small enough to pass through the cell wall, but too large to pass into the vacuole.

Plant roots can acquire amino acids individually or as peptides and proteins via endocytosis and various amino acid, peptide, and protein transporters (Fischer et al. 1998, Rentsch et al. 2007, Paungfoo-Lonhienne et al. 2008). Absorbed proteinaceous material can then be transferred to vascular tissue (phloem and xylem), where it is transported to and from the shoot or transformed into other molecules (Rentsch et al. 2007). In the shoot, amino acids and peptides are exchanged between vascular tissue and mesophyll cells where they are metabolized and assimilated by chloroplasts (Miflin and Lea 1977). Subsequently, chloroplasts contain the largest concentration of amino acids in the shoot (Riens et al. 1991). In our experiment we visually confirmed similar transfers using QD-glycine. We observed the movement of QD-glycine from root cells (Fig. 3B) to vascular tissue (Fig. 3E) and from mesophyll cells (Fig. 3C) to chloroplasts (Fig. 3F) within a 24-h period. If the bound substrates or polymer coatings were removed from QDs by plant or microbial processes, we would expect QD fluorescence in the main storage sites of cadmium (QD core) or zinc (QD shell) within plants. Plants typically store cadmium in the apoplast (free space outside the plasma membrane) and zinc in the vacuoles of epidermal and subepidermal cells (cells lacking chloroplasts (Vazquez et al. 1992, 1994, Sarret et al. 2002). However, in our study we observed QD fluorescence in vacuoles of mesophyll cells and in chloroplasts, areas expected to contain amino acids individually or as peptide chains.

Contrary to the prevailing paradigm, AMF took up labile (QD-glycine) and recalcitrant (QD-chitosan) forms of ON. The QD-chitosan was located within the cytoplasm after 5 h of incubation, similar to Penicillium solitum. The QD-glycine was located in tube-shaped vacuoles, complimenting AMF location of phosphate in
previous studies (Ashford 2002, Uetake et al. 2002). As shown in Fig. 1A, the red QDs used were encased in a polymer with carboxyl terminals, so even if the ON attached was mineralized it was still bound to a carboxyl group of the QD polymer. Since QDs were taken up only when bound to ON compounds, it appears that ON was acquired directly and actively by AMF.

A few studies have demonstrated that AMF can obtain N derived from organic sources (Cliquet et al. 1997, Hawkins et al. 2000, Hodge et al. 2001, Rains and Bledsoe 2007), but without direct imaging it is difficult to determine whether AMF can take up N in organic form. In a laboratory microcosm, Hodge et al. (2001) placed 15N-labeled litter in soil compartments that could be accessed by AM hyphae but not by plant roots. In doing so, they demonstrated that AMF can acquire N from organic material. However, this approach cannot be easily replicated under field conditions. Mesh- enclosed cores could be installed that allow ingrowth by fungal hyphae but not roots. Unfortunately, though, it is difficult to prevent ON from diffusing to or from the core. Hobbie and Hobbie (2006) recently used natural abundance of 15N in plants and fungi to estimate that ectomycorrhizal fungi are responsible for 61–86% of N uptake by plants in Arctic tundra. However, these calculations require that all pools of available N in the soil display similar 15N signatures. This condition may not be met in many ecosystems.

In one of the few studies of microbial uptake of QDs, Kloepfer et al. (2005) observed QD-adenine uptake by wild-type strains of Bacillus subtilis, but not by ade and apt mutants, which had previously displayed reduced ability to acquire adenine. They interpreted their findings as evidence the QD uptake was governed by processing mechanisms for the adenine. In our study, Penicillium solitum, Poa annua, and AMF did not take up QDs that were unbound to a substrate, nor did they take up unbound QDs in solution with a substrate but without binding reagent. In this case, it is possible that the fungi and plants were targeting the glycine, arginine, and chitosan for acquisition and then incidentally taking up the conjugated QDs in the process.

We determined that QDs may be used in conjunction with field imaging techniques. Quantum dots of any color will fluoresce under standard UV light. Therefore, QDs are commonly imaged using epifluorescent and confocal microscopy (Voura et al. 2004, Chen et al. 2006). These methods incorporate continuous viewing coupled with light intensity detectors or software, providing quantitative results comparable to fluorescent spectrophotometers (Yezhelyev et al. 2007). Mycorrhizae and plant roots can be imaged in a similar manner using underground minirhizotron cameras. Minirhizotron cameras are commonly fitted with a UV light source and can take photos of 4 μm resolution (Hendrick and Pregitzer 1996). We did not quantitatively examine QD uptake in this study. However, we did use minirhizotron imaging to confirm ON uptake by


Ecology, 90(1), 2009, pp. 100–108
© 2009 by the Ecological Society of America


fungal hyphae in soil. Moreover, we found that QDs can be used with portable handheld UV lights to observe uptake in grass shoots with the naked eye. This method would allow a researcher to apply QD-labeled nutrients to natural systems and nondestructively determine uptake among plants in real time.

In applying QDs in ecological studies, we must consider two major concerns: artifacts related to QD size and potential toxicity of heavy metals. Currently, most commercial polymer QDs are fairly large after conjugation, roughly the size of small proteins. Quantum dot size can influence uptake dynamics of labeled compounds. Kloepfer et al. (2005) found that QDs larger than 5 nm diameter were not taken up by certain bacterial cells. However, the field of QD technology is rapidly advancing, and some commercial companies now offer polymer QDs as small as 2 nm, equivalent to the size of two nucleic acids (NNT). Smaller QDs could be ideal candidates to address ecological questions comparing multiple microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. Additionally, heavy-metal toxicity from QDs has been demonstrated in bacteria and human cell lines (e.g., Kloepfer et al. 2005, Cho et al. 2007). However, little is known about QD effects to the environment. Most commercial QDs contain cores of cadmium, a known carcinogen. Although cadmium cores are protected in zinc sulfide and
polymer coatings, strict safety precautions must be considered for QD use in environ- mental studies. As a possible alternative, iron- and silica- based QDs are currently in development (Zheng et al. 2005, Buehler et al. 2006, Lee et al. 2007); since they contain no cadmium, toxicity should be less of a concern. These versions of QDs may be particularly useful for ecological applications.

Our study contributes to the growing body of literature demonstrating that AMF may have a more significant effect on ON dynamics than previously believed (Na ̈sholm et al. 1998, Hawkins et al. 2000, Hodge et al. 2001, Rains and Bledsoe 2007). The QD technique provides a simple, inexpensive, and nondestructive measure of mycorrhizal fungi and root uptake in natural systems. By using this technique to trace the uptake of ON molecules, researchers could improve our knowledge of nutrient acquisition by organisms in general and the role of AMF in plant ON uptake in particular.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank D. LeBauer, K. McGuire, D. Potts, R. Pratt, R. Sinsabaugh, P. Stoimenov, and J. Talbot for intellectual contributions. This research was supported by the Kearney Foundation, NSF (DEB-0445458, EAR-0433918), and the Department of Energy (DE-FG02-95ER62083).


Ecology, 90(1), 2009, pp. 100–108
© 2009 by the Ecological Society of America


LITERATURE CITED
Alivisatos, A. P., W. Gu, and C. Larabell. 2005.
Quantum dots as cellular probes. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 7:55–76.
Ashford, A. 2002.
Tubular vacuoles in arbuscular mycorrhizas. New Phytologist 154:545–547.
Binod, P., C. Sandhya, P. Suma, G. Szakacs, and A. Pandey. 2007.
Fungal biosynthesis of endochitinase and chitobiase in solid state fermentation and their application for the production of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine from colloidal chitin. Bioresource Technology 98:2742–2748.
Buehler, T. M., V. Chan, A. J. Ferguson, A. S. Dzurak, F. E. Hudson, D. J. Reilly, A. R. Hamilton, R. G. Clark, D. N. Jamieson, C. Yang, C. I. Pakes, and S. Prawer. 2006.
Controlled single electron transfer between Si:P dots. Applied Physics Letters 88:192–101.
Chan, C. W., and S. Nie. 1998.
Quantum dot biconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection. Science 25:2016–2018.
Chen, W., P. Liu, A. Zhang, J. Ren, and L. X. Xu. 2006.
Quantification of quantum dots in HUVECs by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Pages 1478–1481 in Proceedings: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Los Alamitos, California, USA.
Cho, S. J., D. Maysinger, M. Jain, B. Roder, S. Hackbarth, and F. M. Winnik. 2007.
Long-term exposure to CdTe quantum dots causes functional impairments in live cells. Langmuir 23: 1974–1980.
Cliquet, J. B., P. J. Murray, and J. Boucaud. 1997.
Effect of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum on the uptake of amino nitrogen by Lolium perenne. New Phytol- ogist 137:345–349.
Dubertret, B., P. Skourides, D. J. Norris, V. Noireaux, A. H. Brivanlou, and A. Libchaber. 2002.
In vivo imaging of quantum dots encapsulated in phospholipids micelles. Science 298:1759–1762.
Fischer, W. N., A. Bruno, D. Rentsch, S. Krolkiewicz, M. Tegeder, K. Breitkreuz, and W. B. Frommer. 1998.
Amino acid transport in plants. Trends in Plant Science 3:188–195.
Gao, X. H., Y. Y. Cui, R. M. Levenson, L. W. K. Chung, and S. M. Nie. 2004.
In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots. Nature Biotechnology 22:969– 976.
Garon, E. B., L. Marcu, Q. Luong, O. Tcherniantchouk, G. M. Crooks, and H. P. Koeffler. 2007.
Quantum dot labeling and tracking of human leukemic, bone marrow and cord blood cells. Leukemia Research 31:643–651.
Griffin, D. H. 1994.
Fungal physiology. Second edition. Wiley- Liss, New York, New York, USA.
Hawkins, H. J., A. Johansen, and E. George. 2000.
Uptake and transport of organic and inorganic nitrogen by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil 226:275–285.
Hendrick, R. L., and K. S. Pregitzer. 1996.
Applications of minirhizotrons to understand root function in forests and other natural ecosystems. Plant and Soil 185:293–304.
Hillenga, D. J., H. J. M. Versantvoort, A. J. M. Driessen, and W. N. Konings. 1996.
Basic amino acid transport in plasma membrane vesicles of Penicillium chrysogenum. Journal of Bacteriology 178:3991–3995.
Hobbie, J. E., and E. A. Hobbie. 2006.
N-15 in symbiotic fungi and plants estimates nitrogen and carbon flux rates in Arctic tundra. Ecology 87:816–822.
Hodge, A., C. D. Campbell, and A. H. Fitter. 2001.
An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material. Nature 413:297–299.
Kitamoto, K., K. Yoshizawa, Y. Ohsumi, and Y. Anraku. 1988.
Dynamic aspects of vacuolar and cytosolic amino-acid pools of Saccharomyces-Cerevisiae. Journal of Bacteriology 170:2683–2686.
Kloepfer, J. A., R. E. Mielke, and J. L. Nadeau. 2005.
Uptake of CdSe and CdSe/ZnS quantum dots into bacteria via purine-dependent mechanisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71:2548–2557.
Lee, H., M. K. Yu, S. Park, S. Moon, J. J. Min, Y. Y. Jeong, H. W. Kang, and S. Jon. 2007.
Thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and application as a dual imaging probe for cancer in vivo. Journal of the American Chemical Society 129:12739–12745.
Liebig, J. V., editor. 1843.
Chemistry in its applications to agriculture and physiology. Third English edition.
Taylor and Walton, London, UK. Lipson, A. A., and R. K. Monson. 1998.
Plant-microbe competition for soil amino acids in the alpine tundra: effects of freeze-thaw and dry-rewet events. Oecologia 113:406–414.
Lipson, D., and T. Na ̈ sholm 2001.
The unexpected versatility of plants: organic nitrogen use and availability in terrestrial ecosystems. Oecologia 128:305–316.
Marx, D. H. 1969.
The influence of ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi on the resistance of pine roots to pathogenic infections. I. Antagonism of mycorrhizal fungi to root pathogenic fungi and soil bacteria. Phytopathology 59:153–163.
Michalet, X., F. F. Pinaud, L. A. Bentolila, J. M. Tsay, S. Doose, J. J. Li, G. Sundaresan, A. M. Wu, S. S. Gambhir, and S. Weiss. 2005.
Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science 307:538–544.
Miflin, B. J., and P. J. Lea. 1977.
Amino acid metabolism. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 28:299–329.
Miller, A. J., and M. D. Cramer. 2005.
Root nitrogen acquisition and assimilation. Plant and Soil 274:1–36.
Na ̈ sholm, T., A. Ekblad, A. Nordin, R. Giesler, M. Ho ̈ gberg, and P. Ho ̈ gberg. 1998.
Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen. Nature 392:914–916.
Newman, E. I., and P. Reddell. 1987.
The distribution of mycorrhizas among families of vascular plants. New Phytol- ogist 106:745–751.
Paungfoo-Lonhienne, C., T. G. A. Lonhienne, D. Rentsch, N. Robinson, M. Christie, R. I. Webb, H. K. Gamage, B. J. Carroll, P. M. Schenk, and S. Schmidt. 2008.
Plants can use protein as a nitrogen source without assistance from other organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 105:4524–4529.
Qian, J., K. T. Yong, I. Roy, T. Y. Ohulchanskyy, E. J. Bergey, H. H. Lee, K. M. Tramposch, S. L. He, A. Maitra, and P. N. Prasad. 2007.
Imaging pancreatic cancer using surface- functionalized quantum dots. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 111:6969–6972.
Rains, K. C., and C. S. Bledsoe. 2007.
Rapid uptake of N-15- ammonium and glycine-C-13, N-15 by arbuscular and ericoid mycorrhizal plants native to a Northern California coastal pygmy forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 39:1078–1086.
Read, D. J. 1991.
Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experientia 47: 376–391.
Reiss, P., J. Bleuse, and A. Pron. 2002.
Highly luminescent CdSe/ZnSe core/shell nanocrystals of low size dispersion. Nanotechnology Letters 2:781–784.
Rentsch, D., S. Schmidt, and M. Tegeder. 2007.
Transporters for uptake and allocation of organic nitrogen compounds in plants. Plant Transporters and Channels 581:2281–2289.
Riens, B., G. Lohaus, D. Heineke, and H. W. Heldt. 1991.
Amino acid and sucrose content determined in the cytosolic, chloroplastic, and vacuolar compartments and in the phloem sap of spinach leaves. Plant Physiology 97:227–233.
Roos, W., R. Schulze, and J. Steighardt. 1997.
Dynamic compartmentation of vacuolar amino acids in Penicillium cyclopium: cytosolic adenylates act as a control signal for efflux into the cytosol. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272: 15849–15855.
Sarret, G., P. Saumitou-Laprade, V. Bert, O. Proux, J.-L. Hazemann, A. Traverse, M. A. Marcus, and A. Manceau. 2002.
Forms of zinc accumulated in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Plant Physiology 130:1815–1826.
Schulten, H. R., and M. Schnitzer. 1998.
The chemistry of soil organic nitrogen: a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 26: 1–15.
Smith, F. A., and S. E. Smith. 1997.
Tansley Review No. 96: structural diversity in (vesicular)-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytologist 137:373–388.
Smith, S. E., and D. J. Read. 1997.
Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Second edition. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
Tiedje, J. M., S. AsumingBrempong, K. Nusslein, T. L. Marsh, and S. J. Flynn. 1999.
Opening the black box of soil microbial diversity. Applied Soil Ecology 13:109–122.
Treseder, K. K., and M. F. Allen. 2000.
Black boxes and missing sinks: fungi in global change research. Mycological Research 104:1282–1283.
Turnbull, M. H., R. Goodall, and G. R. Stewart. 1995.
The impact of mycorrhizal colonization upon nitrogen source utilization and metabolism in seedlings of Eucalyptus grandis Hill. Ex. maiden and Eucalyptus maculate Hook. Plant Cell Environment 18:1386–1394.
Uetake, Y., T. Kojima, T. Ezawa, and M. Saito. 2002.
Extensive tubular vacuole system in an arbuscular mycorrhi- zal fungus, Gigaspora margarita. New Phytologist 154:761– 768.
Vazquez, M. D., J. Barcelo, C. Poschenrieder, J. Madico, P. Hatton, A. J. M. Baker, and G. H. Cope. 1992.
Localization of zinc and cadmium in Thlaspi-Caerulescens (Brassicaceae), a metallophyte that can hyperaccumulate both metals. Journal of Plant Physiology 140:350–355.
Vazquez, M. D., C. Poschenrieder, J. Barcelo, A. J. M. Baker, P. Hatton, and G. H. Cope. 1994.
Compartmentation of zinc in roots and leaves of the zinc hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens J and C Presl. Botanica Acta 107:243–250.
Vitousek, P. M. 1997.
On regressive and residuals: response to Knops et al. Oecologia 110:557–559.
Voura, E. B., J. K. Jaiswal, H. Mattoussi, and S. M. Simon. 2004.
Tracking metastatic tumor cell extravasation with quantum dot nanocrystals and fluorescence emission-scan- ning microscopy. Nature Medicine 10:993–998.
Wong, M. S., and G. D. Stucky. 2001.
Facile synthesis of nanocrystalline semiconductor quantum dots. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 221:U572.
Yezhelyev, M. V., et al. 2007.
In situ molecular profiling of breast cancer biomarkers with multicolor quantum dots. Advanced Materials 19:3146–3151.
Zheng, Y., Y. Cheng, Y. Wang, and F. Boa. 2005.
Synthesis and shape evolution of [alpha]-Fe2O3 nanophase through two-step oriented aggregation in solvothermal system. Journal of Crystal Growth 284:221–225.



 

Do my plants need Mycorrhizae?
Find out Here!

 

Toll Free: 1-866-476-7800



   
 
Mycorrhizal Applications | Who We Are | Do I Need Mycorrhizae? | MycoApply® Product Information | Info Articles | Independent Research | Quick Reference - Plants & Fungicides | Mycocyclopedia | Picture Gallery | Movie Gallery | F.A.Q. | Customer Testimonials | Customer Support | Contact Us

© 2004 Mycorrhizal Applications Inc. / All rights reserved